• Saint George |
  • Cedar City |
  • Mesquite

  • More
  • More
  • More
  • Emergency Appeal Filed to Halt Sale of Jeremy Johnson's Properties
    by Morgan Skinner, KCSG News
    Published - 09/23/11 - 06:21 PM | 4 4 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
    Jeremy D. Johnson. (AP photo)
    Jeremy D. Johnson. (AP photo)
    slideshow
    (San Francisco, CA) - St. George businessman Jeremy Johnson filed a Pro Se appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco Friday to halt the sale of his properties by Statewide, a Salt Lake City auction company, scheduled for Saturday in Hurricane. Minutes later Attorney Michael Studebaker filed a motion to stay the court ordered sale with a Memorandum of Law in Support of the Stay. No Stay Order was issued by the Court as of 5:00PM Friday.

    The sale approved by Nevada Federal Judge Roger Hunt August 25, 2011, authorized the receiver, appointed by the court, to sell properties owned by Johnson and his associates over their objection, that includes houseboats, aircraft, multiple real estate properties, classic cars and other items. Court Order

    Johnson contends other means would bring greater value other than a local auction. He has previously stated in court records that the vehicles are collector's items which will not realize full value in an auction at Hurricane, Utah but will appreciate in value while court proceedings are pending. None of the items scheduled for sale are perishable and the current depressed state of the economy favors selling any assets at a later date, according to court records. There is not imminent need for a sale, he said.

    Johnson contends his company and property have been taken without due process and has filed an appeal to stay further action by the receiver until there is final resolution in the civil case brought by the Federal Trade Commission for alleged illegal internet sales activities, an allegation that he has denied. Johnson said the FTC has used lengthy news releases asserting allegations against he and his associates which are untrue and have yet to be proven in court.

    Utah attorney Michael Studebaker represents Duane Fielding, Anton Holdings and Network Agenda, named by the FTC in court records. He told KCSG News that his clients filed a motion to Stay Enforcement of the Court Order providing for the sale and included a Memorandum of Law for the appeal. He said the filing by his clients is in addition to the Pro Se appeal filed by Johnson earlier Friday. Motion to Stay - Memorandum of Law

    Studebaker said the sale by the receiver should be stayed until the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals makes its determination. The Court on Friday routinely set forth the time line of the case ordering a transcript of the case due November 21, 2011. Jeremy D. Johnson's (the Appellant) opening brief to be filed by January 3, 2012 and the Federal Trade Commission (Appellee) answering brief by February 2, 2012 with Johnson's optional reply brief due 14 days after service of the answering brief.

    Studebaker said the case affects a large number of people, like his clients, and the FTC appears to have made a strategic calculation to overwhelm the Court and defense attorneys with massive amounts of documents making allegations that so far have been without substance.

    Johnson was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona and extradited to Utah on a single count of mail-order fraud where he was jailed until a week ago Thursday when he was released after family and friends posted a $2.8-million dollar bond. Sixteen people put up their homes, property or other financial holdings to secure his release.

    Studebaker said the single-count of mail fraud filed against Johnson and his imprisonment for 95-days appears an abuse of the judicial system by federal authorities. Nathan A. Crane of Peter Stirba & Associates, has been appointed by the Court to represent Johnson in the mail-fraud complaint filed in Utah federal court.
    Comments
    (4)
    Comments-icon Post a Comment
    3for5spotshooter
    |
    September 25, 2011
    I am all for justice. but seizure of property BEFORE guilt is proven?

    I suspect the next step is not to give him his assets to defend himself. Then he would have no money and have to hire a public "pretender" telling him to take a plea for about a million years time.

    This looks awfully heavy handed. I mean it seems like each client that he had could have lost like what $50 to $100. So really the government wants to seize the assets, not allow the guy a defense, and then give all of the damaged parties pennies each... while the govt keeps the assets...

    He must be not guilty to get this kind of treatment or look like an easy target...

    On the other side of the coin... the govt better win this one now that some young hot shot started it or it is going to get expensive and be a career buster if somebody loses this case.

    Lots riding in both directions, but the govt. is not playing fair. I agree with the comment that he is not a drug seller and this is not about selling cars used to run drugs etc. I am shocked that a judge can sell his cars and other stuff before he is guilty.
    Brandalok
    |
    September 25, 2011
    So this guy hasn't even had a trial and they are treating him like he is already guilty and selling off his things? It's a sad day in America when you're convicted without a trial. What's next? We should all be very afraid of a government gone rogue.
    Kevin55
    |
    September 24, 2011
    Thank God a judge finally woke up and looked at the merits in this case before jumping the gun with an adverse ruling.
    Patrick Henry
    |
    September 24, 2011
    No judgment against him, then it's not a legal auction. Jeremy is not a drug kingpin, and has the same right to due process as does any other citizen. Selling off his assets is strictly forbidden by the Bill of Rights. The FTC should be slapped down for this by the Ninth Circuit Court, or none of us is safe from the fedbots.
    Loading
    Submit an Event