• Saint George |
  • Cedar City |
  • Mesquite

  • More
  • More
  • More
  • Bank of America Foreclosures Continue Despite Statements of Halting Activity in 50 States
    by Morgan Skinner, KCGS News
    Published - 10/13/10 - 01:54 PM | 3 3 comments | 30 30 recommendations | email to a friend | print
    (St. George, UT) - On Monday, a few days after the Bank of America announced that it was halting foreclosures until it could review foreclosure documents for potential errors, the bank posted a notice of foreclosure sale in southern Utah. When KCSG news learned of the foreclosure sale, we asked Bank of America spokes woman Jumana Bauwen to explain. Tuesday she replied, "We (the bank) will continue the foreclosure process on delinquent borrowers, but will not proceed to judgment or with a foreclosure sale at this time."

    David and Tammara Robinson of Ivins Utah arrived home Monday to find a Notice of Sale posted by ReconTrust Company on their door stating their home would be sold on November 9, 2010 at foreclosure auction. Robinson’s attorney John Christian Barlow told KCSG News, “This action only demonstrates the great lengths Bank of America will go to cover up its fraudulent activity in the mortgage industry. The bank is desperate to foreclose on homes because once it's foreclosed the evidence of wrongdoing is gone," he said.

    The Robinson's saga is typical of many homeowners whose loans are serviced by Bank of America. The Robinsons built their dream home in 2002. After a series of loan transfers their home loan finally landed with Countrywide Home Loans which went bankrupt and was acquired in a $4.1 billion dollar stock transaction completed July 1, 2008.

    In 2008 when the economy tanked, the Robinson's income decreased. Eventually, they were able to make up the payments and had nearly caught up their mortgage. However, upon submitting a substantial payment to bring their mortgage current, Bank of America rejected the payment. When the Robinsons called Bank of America to find out why, they were told that the home was in active foreclosure and the bank would not accept the payment.

    The Robinsons had previously attempted to obtain a modification of their mortgage, but the Bank of America denied any modification even though the Robinsons met the criteria for a loan modification. “The Robinsons have the ability to make the mortgage payments on their home," said Barlow, "but the bank doesn't want the money, they want the home.

    KCSG News asked Barlow to explain, "Starting in about 1997 with the emergence of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS), the Bank of America began to securitize mortgage loans called Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS)," he said. "Securities (mortgages) were bundled together and sold into trusts. Investors who purchased heavily in the MBS trusts were teachers unions, police officer, and fireman’s retirement funds. Often, the mortgages were removed from the original trust and placed in another trust and resold," Barlow continued.

    "Upon default of the mortgage, a trust would receive the mortgage insurance, and in most cases there were multiple insurance policies taken out on the mortgage, enabling the trust to collect many times over the value of the home," Barlow said. "Most investors in the trust were not aware of what was happening and did not receive the default mortgage insurance funds," he said. "The trusts that usually benefitted from the default insurance proceeds were owned by Chinese banks, such as HSBC Bank, The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, to name a few,” Barlow stated.

    As the servicer of these default mortgages, Bank of America was free to foreclose on the home and retain the proceeds from foreclosure sale of the home as payment for facilitating the fraud.

    “Bank of America wants you to believe that it has stopped foreclosures to avoid any opposition since the average homeowner likely wouldn't know that their home is being sold," said Barlow. "If there has been notice of the sale posted, likely no other notices will be posted to alert unsuspecting homeowners to the impending loss of their home,” cautioned Barlow.

    "Homeowners have been calling on deaf ears. Utah lawmakers and those empowered to stop the fraudulent activities of national banks are doing nothing to enforce the rights of the state and protect its citizens," said Barlow. "And, if the loss of 'citizen's due process rights' isn't enough," he added, "the state and county governments have lost millions by not enforcing laws requiring the recording of an interest in real property."

    Barlow should know. The Willamette law school grad holds an MBA degree from Loyola-Chicago and is a sole practitioner in a "David & Goliath" showdown with the ReconTrust Company, a subsidiary of Bank of America. He and co-counsel E. Craig Smay represent Peni Cox vs. ReconTrust, a case still before Utah District federal Judge Clark Waddoups after a rehearing August 31, 2010 over Cox's petition asking the Court to remand the case to state court and reinstate an injunction halting Bank of America foreclosures in Utah. The case has also been appealed to the Tenth Circuit Court in Denver. The Appeals Court has delayed action on the case until Judge Waddoups makes his ruling.

    “It's a fierce battle between attorneys who fight for the due process rights of homeowners and the bank legal teams hired to steal the due process rights of homeowners," Barlow said.

    According to the ReconTrust Company website, there are 1218 Utah homeowners in foreclosure this month and 244 Utah homes have already been foreclosed.
    Comments
    (3)
    Comments-icon Post a Comment
    top38
    |
    December 13, 2010
    Fred Smith you are exactly right, " THIS IS A LEVEL OF FRAUD THAT THE AMERICAN PUBLIC HAS NOT YET CONTEMPLATED." If B of A has been found doing this than there could be many others. ( I trully wish I could say if B of A was caught doing this but I can't no one has tried to do anything about it.) If I am wrong please let me know. People are loosing their houses so that the investors can get paid 1,2,3 times over their losses from the claims of their Mortgage Insurance Company THAT the victim / home owner was paying on. Even if this happened once why isn't it on the evening news? This article implies that it was common and that leads me to my first statement; if B of A there could be other servicers as well totaling 10s of thousands of homeowners that were paying for the same mortgage insurance that would very well be the enticement/ driving force behind them being kicked out of their house. May I add with no regard for the home owner that is making them tons of money. I am a Realtor that has been helping people modify their mortgages and short sales for their upside down homes. Being on the front lines battling it out with the banks seeing them make decisions that make absolutely no sense aside from the reported news of this article can make someones skin crawl. It is like a secret cancer that is attacking our homelands creating such oppression on our people/economy and no one is doing anything to address it. We are all asleep with our anti anxiety meds all the while we are having our futures hacked away. This is a straight on attack to our families, our financial system/ economy, our well being/ health. It is ruining marriages, creating chaos while the ones involved are making millions and millions of dollars. We are being misinformed from our direct leaders in which they may be very well being misinformed as well. Our Government owns Fannie May and Freddie Mack. They are the higher echelons of the Mortgage world. They and the Hong Cong, Shanghai Corporate banking World are making billions of dollars by squeezing/ extracting our money from us. Or on the other side living in fear relying on their lies for false hope for the future. My advice is to not fight the Battle but try and add to the power to win the War. If you are upside down trying to fight the bank with your mortgage. Let it go in the best way possible to do the least amount of damage to your credit. Then replace your self strategically to be inline to be able to buy a house again ASAP. If you can get out of your house and back into another one withing the next 18 months you will still be buying back in at the bottom of the market. Then earn yourself equity over the next ten years apposed to the other side of that were you modify your mortgage agreeing to be under water for the life of your existence in that home. If you plan on moving in the next 18 months then ok. But if that is the house you plan on living in over the next 10 years on do not sign into a marriage of Renting from the Government. Then go you help win the War by being there for people that are going through the same problem, help them make a decision for their family/ selves to not be a tenant to the Government. Everyone should SHAVE OFF THIS NEGATIVE debt ASAP to take the pain head on. Then began the healing process and move on. 5-10 years down the line they will be in a completely different frame of mind/ environment. A positive one all the way around. Benefiting their families and their health and the financial future. If you don't do this you are prolonging the disease that can take 5-10-12 years or even your life. I pray that God will Bless YOU ALL and grant you wisdom and strength to fight this battle. Forgive the grammar errors and miss spellings!! I had allot to say with a little bit of time. If you need help I can try and answer some questions for you at top38@live.com.
    mere
    |
    October 15, 2010
    We were originally with Countrywide then Bank of America took over. We have been trying to get a modification for 4 months now and they keep telling us they are still working on it. Then 2 weeks age our house is listed in the paper to be sold on court house steps on Nov 2. My sons called before this notice and offered to pay money to catch up but they would not take any money. WHY. We own a construction company and our business has been killed by the economy. Now we sit with nerves on edge not knowing what to do. Help. We have always owned a home, we put 60,000 down on this one. What has happened to our country. Obama needs to help the people instead of the banks. they just keep getting richer. Disgusted legal white American.
    Fred Smith
    |
    October 14, 2010
    Nobody has brought up the distinct possibility that the loan servicers may well have bundled and sold each of these loans MORE THAN ONCE to differernt investors via the securitization process. THIS COULD BE THE REAL REASON THAT THERE IS NO DOCUMENTATION / PAPER TRAIL. The non-existent documentation and accounting is entirely consistent with this scenario. This means that the entire plan was a true Ponzi scheme in the worst sense. In other words, rather than selling the loan once to investors, as we have all naively been assuming, there is no reason to believe that they did not double-dip or quintuple-dip and sell the exact same loan to completely new buyers. THIS IS A LEVEL OF FRAUD THAT THE AMERICAN PUBLIC HAS NOT YET CONTEMPLATED.
    Loading
    Submit an Event